There are a couple of things that interest me right away:
- The museum is using the idea of social networking (software donated by IBM) to invite persons to contribute to the museum's collection.
- I like the web mapping right on the top part of the site - which allows someone to explore threads and visually see how concepts are linked to other concepts. People can then explore many different paths to learn - unlike the physical space of walking down a hallway or going to a room where someone else has decided what should be on display and "linked" together (think tagging...)!
- I have a sense that today's learners can jump onto this method of building a museum much more quickly than those of my generation. The older thought process goes something like:
- A "curator" (think expert) decides what should go into a museum.
- A building is built to house the artifacts.
- It opens
- The public is invited to come and "learn" about what the "experts" know about this topic.
- We progress through the structure (maybe even have a guide) and soak up as much as we can. (there could be a test when we get back to the classroom...)
- Maybe we come back next year since we really liked the way that the museum displayed the artifacts. Maybe "they" added some new artifacts or have a different display!
How about your classroom? Where do your thoughts go related to your classroom museum...?
1 comment:
I'm a little disappointed that there doesn't seem to be a way to "rate" the contributions of others to that museum. Crowdsourcing seems to work best when the mob gets to vote up the best contributions (a la Digg).
Post a Comment